I’ve always
enjoyed reading about female outsiders on the margins of society, often set
apart by the impulse to question. The novels of Anita Brookner and Jean Rhys
formed a significant literary backdrop to the world of my twenties so I was shocked and
saddened to learn yesterday, on Facebook, of the death of one of my all-time
favourite writers: Anita Brookner. She passed away last week on 10 March and,
as the mother of a seven-week old infant, I admit I am slightly out-of-touch
these days, so I was somewhat late in learning the news.
Anita Brookner (1928-2016) |
My first
introduction to Brookner’s universe occurred during my teens, in the
library in Carrick-on-Shannon, the town where I grew up. I chanced upon Providence (1982) on a shelf, opened a
random page and was instantly hooked.
Some years later, in 1996, I wrote my MA thesis on Brookner at NUI
Galway (then UCG), focusing on Romanticism and Existentialism in her novels
and refuting claims, mostly made by male critics, that she wrote ‘romantic
novels’ (Bayles dismissed Hotel du Lac
(1993) as ‘Harlequin Romance for Highbrows’). Anita Brookner never complied
with the conventions of the popular romance, such as fantasy resolution
through fusion and marriage. I believe her work is intimately involved with the modes of Romanticism which is characterized, instead, by
fragmentation, and also with Existentialism, where separateness and alienation
are central to her ‘poetics of loss’. In fact, a typical Brookner ending,
with its raised expectations and ironic reversal, approximates more towards
‘anti-romance’. Many of her heroines are prompted, by the stark
anti-romanticism of their realities, to re-evaluate expectations of
people and the world around them. Often, they may start out looking to literary
paradigms to answer their questions about life, then they gradually arrive
at new insights about themselves and their immediate environments. So, while 'happy
endings' are scarce in her work, Brookner’s protagonists often move beyond
delusion to a greater understanding; they are empowered to strive for
authenticity in their lives.
Throughout
her career, Brookner has been unflinchingly courageous in tackling tricky
subjects without whitewashing the grittiness. She herself once wrote in the Times Literary Supplement ‘…there is a
truth even more terrible than [we] suppose and it was discovered by certain
members of the Romantic generation. The truth is this: reason does not work any
better than myth.” Her novels are interested in subjectivity as it is
constituted socially, culturally and psychologically. They offer us worlds
where diverse themes are explored, such as family relationships, female
friendships, bonds between men and women, power struggles, bonds of religion
and bonds between life and the aesthetic realm. A joy to read on a linguistic
level as they are so elegantly crafted, they are also refreshingly honest; she does not shirk from the big themes of love, sex, isolation and loneliness,
gender, ageing, myth vs ‘reality’ in an absurd universe. Brookner’s hesitancy
to inscribe redemption can be taken as a counter-statement – one which exposes
the repressive effects of romantic myth in Western culture and highlights how
it can so easily worm its way into our lives. In an interview for The Paris Review in 1987 the novelist
herself stated: “The true Romantic novel is about delayed happiness, and the
pilgrimage you go through to reach that happiness.”
It is some
years now since I read her work but, at one point, shortly after I wrote my
thesis I was reading her constantly. Then, somewhere along my reading journey,
I decided to take a break from her somewhat bleak, yet honest, worldvision and,
in particular, from the too neat binary recognizable in some of her female
characters: charismatic glamour-puss ('winner') is pitted against the
introverted book worm ('loser'). This was one of the few tics in her
corpus that cloyed for me. The rest of the journey was magical and I drank in
her prose and stylish syntactical choices, as well as the candour of her
psychological insight. For my money, Hotel
du Lac was over-hyped and some of her later novels surpassed it, but it has
certainly become a worthy classic, and the Booker prize it garnered in 1984
was a rare moment during her long, prolific career, where critics shone a light
upon her outstanding talent.